[meta-ti] [PATCH 1/3] matrix-gui-browser: port from arago overlay

[William Mills]

On 01/27/2012 02:46 PM, Maupin, Chase wrote:
> I guess we have a difference of opinion on how we see meta-arago. I 
> don’t separate that layer into distro and non-distro. I was really 
> planning on meta-arago being all the stuff related to the arago/SDK 
> distribution. Meta-ti is for TI packages that can be used by other 
> distros. That being said I'm OK with meta-ti being split into a BSP 
> layer and everthing else, but I don't know exactly what that buys us. 
> Does it particularly hurt someone that pulls in meta-ti to have access 
> to matrix if they don't use it? I pull in things from meta-oe or 
> oe-core that I don’t "need" but they are there anyway.

Do you know that everything you are putting in meta-ti today only 
depends on oe-core?  I don't think you do as we are not testing that 
today.  Yes, in the old days a recipie collection had tons of stuff that 
would be present but just fail if you actually tried to use it.  The 
point of layers was to clean that up.