[meta-ti] [PATCH 1/3] matrix-gui-browser: port from arago overlay

[William Mills]

On 01/27/2012 03:11 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 01:10:22PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 1:03 PM, William Mills<wmills at ti.com>  wrote:
>>> OK this part is off list.
>>>
>>> Go look at meta-intel and then look at the meta-ti your guys are purposing.
>>>    Now, your an engineer in a hurry and you need to choose between intel ATOM
>>> and TI ARM.  Which one looks simpler, clearer, and well organized.  Which do
>>> you want to use?
>> The problem we have here is that one of them (meta-intel) is "just use
>> poky and this" and one of them is "just use angstrom and meta-oe and
>> this".  And we need to figure out which use cases we want to support,
>> and how.
> "Just use poky and this" is also a valid use case for us.

Yes, but Tom has a point.  I was hoping meta-ti could be an example of 
how a Si vendor could publish their stuff for the OE ecosystem in 
general w/o a poky, angstrom,  etc bias.  Maybe convince the intel guys 
they should look at doing the same.  The more stuff we pile into this 
the harder it is to see that message.