[meta-ti] [PATCH 1/3] matrix-gui-browser: port from arago overlay

Denys Dmytriyenko denis at denix.org
Fri Jan 27 12:24:01 PST 2012


On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 03:19:52PM -0500, Philip Balister wrote:
> On 01/27/2012 03:11 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 01:10:22PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 1:03 PM, William Mills <wmills at ti.com> wrote:
> >>> OK this part is off list.
> >>>
> >>> Go look at meta-intel and then look at the meta-ti your guys are purposing.
> >>>   Now, your an engineer in a hurry and you need to choose between intel ATOM
> >>> and TI ARM.  Which one looks simpler, clearer, and well organized.  Which do
> >>> you want to use?
> >>
> >> The problem we have here is that one of them (meta-intel) is "just use
> >> poky and this" and one of them is "just use angstrom and meta-oe and
> >> this".  And we need to figure out which use cases we want to support,
> >> and how.
> > 
> > "Just use poky and this" is also a valid use case for us.
> > 
> 
> But not for me. I need recipes from meta-oe to ship USRP-E100's and it
> is nice having binary feeds available for customer use. (Angstrom adds
> binary feeds to the mix).

It always possible to add-on stuff. But it's not so easy to remove. Remember 
how awfully huge and messy Classic OE was... Layers were supposed to fix that!

-- 
Denys



More information about the meta-ti mailing list