[meta-ti] [PATCH v2] dspdce-fw: Updated dspdce firmware for latest IPC version

Karthik Ramanan a0393906 at ti.com
Mon Oct 27 01:41:57 PDT 2014


On 08-Oct-14 12:46 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> Karthik,
>
> I'm at lost here. You did address my previous comment of not leaving 2
> versions, just updating from .02 to .04, but I don't understand why do you
> need an .inc file for, if there's only one version left?
>
> I traced it a bit back and there was a recommendation from Franklin about
> creating .inc file for a different recipe for ipumm-fw, but in that case it is
> warranted due to the fact that you pull 2 different sources for 2 platforms.
> So, in that case it might be better having 2 separate recipes for different
> machines with common parts in the .inc file, but see for yourself if that
> produces cleaner and simpler results. It's not alwats clear cut and you may
> need to experiment to choose the right option...
>
> Either way, dspdce-fw doesn't seem to need an .inc file.
>

Denys,

There is a case where there may be multiple dspdce firmware versions 
based on different versions of IPC. It will make sense that we introduce 
the inc file when there is a need.

I will abandon this patch and resubmit a v3 for this.

Regards
Karthik


More information about the meta-ti mailing list