[meta-ti] [PATCH 2/2] ti-xdais: Add version 7.24.00.04

[Jacob Stiffler]

On 5/28/2015 12:20 PM, Jacob Stiffler wrote:
>
>
> On 5/22/2015 2:12 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
>> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 06:29:46AM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote:
>>>
>>> On 5/19/2015 4:11 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
>>>> On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 01:17:42PM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote:
>>>>> I was following the precedent set by existing RTOS packages (See
>>>>> recipes-ti/xdais/ti-xdais_6.26.01.03.bb).
>>>>>
>>>>> These RTOS packages are build only dependencies, and they do not get
>>>>> installed into the target filesystem. They are primarily used for
>>>>> building firmware.
>>>> Should they be "-native" then?
>>>>
>>> I suppose they should be, but this is how is was done before.
>>>
>>> If you look at recipes-ti/includes/ti-paths.inc, you'll see that all
>>> paths point into STAGING_DIR_TARGET
>> Ok, we may end up doing this on the target at some point.
>> Can we simply FILES_${PN} += "*" to pick up everything installed and 
>> shove it
>> into the package? That way we won't need INSANE_SKIP and the build 
>> deps can be
>> used on the target in the future...
>>
>
> Adding all of these files to the ${PN} package causes them to be 
> pulled into the filesystem. Should these instead go into the ${PN}-dev 
> package (they are purely development files), and then 
> ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN} = "1"?
>

Just looked more into this... It got pulled in because I was including a 
dev package in the filesystem.

>>>>> On 5/8/2015 12:23 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>>>>>> On May 8, 2015, at 7:09 AM, Jacob Stiffler <j-stiffler at ti.com> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +INSANE_SKIP_${PN} = "installed-vs-shipped"
>>>>>> can this be fixed instead ?
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> meta-ti mailing list
>>>>> meta-ti at yoctoproject.org
>>>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
>