[meta-ti] [PATCH 2/2] ti-xdais: Add version 7.24.00.04

[Denys Dmytriyenko]

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:20:21PM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/22/2015 2:12 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> >On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 06:29:46AM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote:
> >>
> >>On 5/19/2015 4:11 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> >>>On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 01:17:42PM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote:
> >>>>I was following the precedent set by existing RTOS packages (See
> >>>>recipes-ti/xdais/ti-xdais_6.26.01.03.bb).
> >>>>
> >>>>These RTOS packages are build only dependencies, and they do not get
> >>>>installed into the target filesystem. They are primarily used for
> >>>>building firmware.
> >>>Should they be "-native" then?
> >>>
> >>I suppose they should be, but this is how is was done before.
> >>
> >>If you look at recipes-ti/includes/ti-paths.inc, you'll see that all
> >>paths point into STAGING_DIR_TARGET
> >Ok, we may end up doing this on the target at some point.
> >Can we simply FILES_${PN} += "*" to pick up everything installed and shove it
> >into the package? That way we won't need INSANE_SKIP and the build deps can be
> >used on the target in the future...
> >
> 
> Adding all of these files to the ${PN} package causes them to be
> pulled into the filesystem. Should these instead go into the
> ${PN}-dev package (they are purely development files), and then
> ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN} = "1"?

Actually, that's a good idea. Should we modify other recipes similarly, when 
they only provide build dependencies for DSP?


> >>>>On 5/8/2015 12:23 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> >>>>>>On May 8, 2015, at 7:09 AM, Jacob Stiffler <j-stiffler at ti.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>+INSANE_SKIP_${PN} = "installed-vs-shipped"
> >>>>>can this be fixed instead ?
> >>>>-- 
> >>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>meta-ti mailing list
> >>>>meta-ti at yoctoproject.org
> >>>>https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
>