[meta-xilinx] Warnings that items did not make it into the final kernel configuration
Nathan Rossi
nathan at nathanrossi.com
Wed Aug 31 23:53:54 PDT 2016
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:12 AM, Peter Smith <salerio at gmail.com> wrote:
> Glad its not just me. Do you think it could be related to my use of the
> master branch rather than a released version?
>
> On 31 August 2016 at 15:00, Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans at topic.nl> wrote:
>>
>> On 31-08-16 15:40, SMITH Peter T wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am trying to build core image minimal for the ZCU102 using the master
>>> branches poky and meta-xilinx and I am receiving lots of warnings about
>>> kernel
>>> configurations not making it into the final kernel configurations. Is
>>> this
>>> normal or I have I done something wrong?
>>
>>
>> Well I noticed that the kernel config doesn't quite work as expected on
>> that particular board but I'm still investigating the "why" myself.
Found the bug, it relates to a change in oe-core/kernel-yocto.bbclass
that was made recently 0f698dfd1c8bbc0d53ae7977e26685a7a3df52a3. The
values for KCONFIG_MODE changed, such that it is defaulting to
"allnoconfig". This only applies to zcu102-zynqmp because its the only
machine that uses a KBUILD_DEFCONFIG as the base.
I've staged the following patch
https://github.com/nathanrossi/meta-xilinx/commit/34e08e9f6635d4365058a96ea13bf8286d9930a8.
Could one of you confirm that it resolves the issue and that the built
kernel works?
Thanks,
Nathan
>>
>> --
>> _______________________________________________
>> meta-xilinx mailing list
>> meta-xilinx at yoctoproject.org
>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-xilinx
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Peter
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> meta-xilinx mailing list
> meta-xilinx at yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-xilinx
>
More information about the meta-xilinx
mailing list