[poky] New warning

Paul Eggleton paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com
Fri Jun 22 06:05:07 PDT 2012


On Friday 22 June 2012 14:01:39 Paul Eggleton wrote:
> Rather than ${MACHINE}.patch, the traditional way to do this is to have a
> generic name for the file and then use a MACHINE-named subdirectory within
> your BSP layers to define the machine-specific version. You can always make
> the dummy patch not apply or specifically check for some aspect added by
> the dummy in do_configure.

(Assuming you use a dummy file that is - with the COMPATIBLE_MACHINE fix I 
suggested this is not necessary; this was from an earlier edit of my message.)

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre



More information about the poky mailing list