[poky] New warning

[Gary Thomas]

On 2012-06-22 07:05, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Friday 22 June 2012 14:01:39 Paul Eggleton wrote:
>> Rather than ${MACHINE}.patch, the traditional way to do this is to have a
>> generic name for the file and then use a MACHINE-named subdirectory within
>> your BSP layers to define the machine-specific version. You can always make
>> the dummy patch not apply or specifically check for some aspect added by
>> the dummy in do_configure.
>
> (Assuming you use a dummy file that is - with the COMPATIBLE_MACHINE fix I
> suggested this is not necessary; this was from an earlier edit of my message.)

I like the idea of using COMPATIBLE_MACHINE - I think I can make that work well.

Thanks

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------