[Toaster] DRY RUN [Review Request] 4299 "recipes: View detailed information about a recipe"

[Barros Pena, Belen]

On 13/01/2014 15:10, "Damian, Alexandru" <alexandru.damian at intel.com>
wrote:

>Good question, Dave
>
>
>For packages, we have 2 lists, in different parts of the design, that
>display a list of packages.
>
>
>- all packages build. This is currently the "bpackage" view which uses
>"bpackage.html"; the view/page should be renamed to
>"buildpackages/buildpackages.html"
>
>
>- packages for an image. Currently this is "tpackage", and uses
>"package.html". This should be renamed to
>"targetpackages/targetpackages.html"
>
>
>But we have a single package detail page, and this should be
>"package/package.html".

Actually, for packages installed, we have 2 package details pages. The
build package details:

http://www.yoctoproject.org/toaster/package-built-details-included-busybox.
html

is just a stub, a way of redirecting users to the target package details
page

http://www.yoctoproject.org/toaster/package-included-details.html

I decided to keep the build package details page for installed packages to
avoid disorientation: if you were sent directly from the packages built
table to the packages installed details page you could lose track of your
location within the application. Keeping the build package details page
seemed safer.

Cheers

Belén


>
>Hope this is not too troublesome.
>
>
>Alex
>
>
>
>
>On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Lerner, Dave
><dave.lerner at windriver.com> wrote:
>
>Hi Alex,
>
>You wrote in a reply to David Reyna (he's David and I'll be Dave)...
>
>>
>> - Indeed, we use the pluralized name for pages showing an object list
>>(i.e. tables), and
>> the singular for the detail page for the a single object.
>>
>>
>
>
>Should we rename the exiting package.html to packages.html since
>package.html shows the package table for a build?  That's where I picked
>up what I thought was the naming convention.
>
>Dave Lerner
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-- 
>Alex Damian
>Yocto Project
>
>SSG / OTC 
>
>