[Toaster] DRY RUN [Review Request] 4299 "recipes: View detailed information about a recipe"

[Lerner, Dave]

Hi Belen,
I'm stuck on two issues.

I'm still confused on the navigation, mapping of your view named diagram to actual mouse clicks, that you want to get fire views "Design 1.5.1 Package Details" vs firing the views in "Design 1.1.1 Included Package Detail image".

To get to "Design 1.5.1 Package Details" views I assume that from the All Builds page:
In the Target column of the Table, click on an image
  On the left side click on Packages
	views per Design 1.5.1

How do I get to the "Design 1.1.1 Package Details" views?
Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: toaster-bounces at yoctoproject.org [mailto:toaster-bounces at yoctoproject.org] On
> Behalf Of Barros Pena, Belen
> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 9:24 AM
> To: Damian, Alexandru; Lerner, Dave
> Cc: toaster at yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [Toaster] DRY RUN [Review Request] 4299 "recipes: View detailed information
> about a recipe"
> 
> On 13/01/2014 15:10, "Damian, Alexandru" <alexandru.damian at intel.com>
> wrote:
> 
> >Good question, Dave
> >
> >
> >For packages, we have 2 lists, in different parts of the design, that
> >display a list of packages.
> >
> >
> >- all packages build. This is currently the "bpackage" view which uses
> >"bpackage.html"; the view/page should be renamed to
> >"buildpackages/buildpackages.html"
> >
> >
> >- packages for an image. Currently this is "tpackage", and uses
> >"package.html". This should be renamed to
> >"targetpackages/targetpackages.html"
> >
> >
> >But we have a single package detail page, and this should be
> >"package/package.html".
> 
> Actually, for packages installed, we have 2 package details pages. The
> build package details:
> 
> http://www.yoctoproject.org/toaster/package-built-details-included-busybox.
> html
> 
> is just a stub, a way of redirecting users to the target package details
> page
> 
> http://www.yoctoproject.org/toaster/package-included-details.html
> 
> I decided to keep the build package details page for installed packages to
> avoid disorientation: if you were sent directly from the packages built
> table to the packages installed details page you could lose track of your
> location within the application. Keeping the build package details page
> seemed safer.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Belén
> 
> 
> >
> >Hope this is not too troublesome.
> >
> >
> >Alex
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Lerner, Dave
> ><dave.lerner at windriver.com> wrote:
> >
> >Hi Alex,
> >
> >You wrote in a reply to David Reyna (he's David and I'll be Dave)...
> >
> >>
> >> - Indeed, we use the pluralized name for pages showing an object list
> >>(i.e. tables), and
> >> the singular for the detail page for the a single object.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >Should we rename the exiting package.html to packages.html since
> >package.html shows the package table for a build?  That's where I picked
> >up what I thought was the naming convention.
> >
> >Dave Lerner
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >Alex Damian
> >Yocto Project
> >
> >SSG / OTC
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> toaster mailing list
> toaster at yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/toaster