[Toaster] [review-request] 6040 and 7249: daterange filtering for builds page

Damian, Alexandru alexandru.damian at intel.com
Tue Mar 24 09:48:23 PDT 2015


Taken for submission, with changes to static resources paths - the UI css
has hardcoded URLs that did not match the static assets deployment paths.

Please submit any newer fixes on top of these patches.

Thank you,
Alex

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Reyna, David L (Wind River) <
david.reyna at windriver.com> wrote:

> Hi Belén,
>
> > The spec says "The date format is DD/MM/YYYY."
>
> Ok.
>
> > I understand that the tuple/list is how it's done else...
>
> I have finished refactored the date range data passing and storage (using
> context variables and "data-*" attributes instead), so no more extra tuple
> values.
>
> I just have to finish the "filter" munging to remove the need for the URL
> redirect, and I should have Michael's issues resolved.
>
> > 7461 "Filters not working as designed"
>
> Ok, I have the data counts removed and the radio button enables adjusted.
> I made the change only in the presentation so that we do not lose the
> calculations and structure we currently have in place.
>
> - David
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Barros Pena, Belen [mailto:belen.barros.pena at intel.com]
> > Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 2:54 AM
> > To: Reyna, David; WOOD, MICHAEL; DAMIAN, ALEXANDRU
> > Cc: toaster at yoctoproject.org
> > Subject: Re: [Toaster] [review-request] 6040 and 7249: daterange
> filtering
> > for builds page
> >
> >
> >
> > On 19/03/2015 22:43, "Reyna, David" <david.reyna at windriver.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >  1) Belén wants the edit date fields in "dd/mm/yy", so they do have to
> > >be converted at some point to and from the database format.
> >
> > The spec says "The date format is DD/MM/YYYY." See page 9 of
> >
> > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/attachment.cgi?id=1708
> >
> > That is misleading (sorry). What it should have said is "The date format
> > is the same format used to display the dates in the 'from' and 'to' text
> > fields".
> >
> > >>
> > >> I understand that the tuple/list is how it's done else where but
> > >> unfortunately this is not correct it's not a good idea to rely on the
> > >> fact that the date option is the 4th option, anyone changing that will
> > >> not realise it and it will all break.
> > >
> > >[DLR] I am just following the model that Belén set up.
> >
> > Please don't :) Once again, the prototype code should not be used as a
> > reference for development: only the way the prototype looks like and
> > behaves. The only purpose of the prototype is to bring the design specs
> to
> > life, so that they are easier to follow. The code should not be reused in
> > any way (it's very bad code!).
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Belén
> >
>
>


-- 
Alex Damian
Yocto Project
SSG / OTC
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/toaster/attachments/20150324/bc5523e4/attachment.html>


More information about the toaster mailing list